Author: Giles

We all know about sexism when it comes to women and probably most people have noticed it the other way around too but here a couple of snippets from the other side of the fence.
I just came back from my lunchtime swim. I was just getting changed when a fully clothed woman walked through the changing rooms. I’ve complained about this before but they don’t seem to take it seriously. They say the woman in question (who seems to hang out on a semi-permanent basis in the men’s changing rooms) is there to look after kids. But why can’t she take them to the ladies changing room? I pointed out that there weren’t any kids around today and I pointed out that if the same thing happened with roles reversed the chances are the police would be called. I don’t think it’ll make any difference. I think I’m more bothered by the injustice of it than the actual voyeurism per se.
I read that in the UK 9/10 divorces end with the kids allocated to the mother. I know kids don’t like to be separated and they generally prefer the mother, but this seems like it might be an unfair weighting.
In a Father’s Day television interview in 2002, Bob Geldof spoke out against laws that favored mothers in custody matters. The response was overwhelming: a flood of letters from anguished fathers, more mail than his advocacy on behalf of Africa had ever unleashed. “I just wanted to be with my kids 50% of the time,” he told TIME. “If a man and a woman live together and it fails, that’s tragic. But if you have children, whole universes close to you” if you’re prevented from seeing them.
“Our system is adversarial,” he said, “…The law says it’s gender neutral, but 93% of children go to the women

2 wks ago I had an amazing weekend in Bratislava thanks to my friend, Rado Bonk, a Slovakian who acted as my guide. The main objective was to go to a festival of traditional Carpathian dancing and music.
Rado was most interested in the dance and I was most interested in learning from the musicians. The most amazing part for me was watching an incredible gypsy band play.
Click here to watch them. Stick around till the end of the movie and watch the bass player. (If anyone has any tips on how to put this kind of AVI on the web without paying money for software but still in some sort of compressed and common format, please let me know). I’ve never seen anything quite like it. It sounds a bit messy in the recording but when you were there it didn’t sound messy at all.
The band is called something like Sugo, which is the name of the older guy. The older guy is the father of the bass player and the leftmost violin player. The guy next to the bass player is playing viola. 2 of them are playing with a string which I gave them (my claim to fame).
It was also a new experience to sleep what remained of the night (we got back at 3.45 am and left at 6.45) in a genuine ex-communist appartment block, which Rado had the keys to.

I’m interested what other people think of this letter (below) from New Scientist. I’ve always subscribed to the “a 1000 mile journey starts with the first step” philosophy of personal ethics and social responsibility. In terms of social change, this means that social responsibility for the billions starts with social responsibility for one. How can the whole world change their behaviour if no one individual does? Also a change made by millions cannot happen without millions of individuals like me changing their minds. It’s also inevitable that the initial conditions will be such that a few people have to change their minds without knowing that all the others are going to follow suit. That is unless there were some “prisoner’s choice 2.0 ” type protocol for making collective decisions without taking responsibility first (that paper is really fascinating).
But on the other hand often one knows damn well that the other million aren’t going to follow and just thinks – well what the heck I’ll keep doing xyz ‘cos the others are never going to give a damn. Maybe the key point is that one never knows how one person’s behaviour is going to influence others. I’ve often observed how one person changing their behaviour can have amazing ripple effects. Comments please.

Here’s the letter

Dave Reay makes the oft-repeated assertion that “saving the planet starts at home”. But it is illogical to “multiply up” decisions about one’s personal lifestyle to the population as a whole, unless there is evidence that your choices really will influence others. Otherwise, it’s a question of 10 steps to feeling smug.
The vast majority of people are either unaware of or apathetic about the threat posed by climate change. Those seriously concerned represent a small minority. Any small reduction in emissions that this minority may achieve will probably be negated by market feedback and/or used as an excuse for inaction by politicians.
True, some of the actions suggested – install low-energy light bulbs, cycle to work, compost food waste – make good sense anyway. But then it’s superfluous to invoke the environment as a reason for doing them. Others – turn down the heating in the middle of winter, drive more slowly, make sub-optimal transport choices – are forms of self-punishment that have no chance of ever being adopted by the unconcerned majority.
To have any significant impact on environmental problems, the concerned minority must take public, not private, action to change attitudes and behaviour. Riding your bike or installing roof-mounted solar panels, for instance, are public acts. They are seen and may even be imitated by others, albeit mainly at a local level.
But in the end, climate change is a global problem resulting from the unchecked growth of the fossil-fuel economy. Effective action against it must mean somehow transforming – or disrupting – the global economy.

I can’t bear to watch this but it’s probably important to know about it
http://animali.tiscali.it/Media/video/massacres_dauphins.mov

After some recent visits from Jehovas witnesses on sunday mornings, we read a bit of their leaflet so we could tell them why we weren’t interested next time they came. I’m not against other people getting into this stuff – it doesn’t seem to do anything terrible to anyone. It’s just the arrogance of telling people you are the one and only true way and all the others will be destroyed at Armageddon, because it says so in the Bible which is the word of God (even the bits in the old testament – see below). Anyway – a quick investigation turned up some interesting stuff:
How about this (from their leaflet):
“True Christians are safety conscious – they make sure that their cars and their homes are safe”
There doesn’t seem anything too crazy about this. What seemed strange was that a bible reference was given to back it up (Deuteronomy 22). Does the Bible mention car safety? So we checked the quote. It’s based on the following:
Deuteronomy 22:8
“When thou buildest a new house, then thou shalt make a battlement for thy roof, that thou bring not blood upon thine house, if any man fall from thence.” [King James Bible]
But on the very same page, it turns out that although the Word of God is not very keen on mechanical faults in your car, Bigamy is totally fine, as is raping, making war and having your son put to death for getting drunk.
These are all from Deuteronomy, 21 – check it out for yourself if you don’t believe me…
(Raping and war)
“When you wage war against your enemy and the Lord your God delivers them into your hands and you take some of them captive, then if you see a comely woman among the captives and take a liking to her, you may marry her. You shall bring her into your house where she shall shave her head, pare her nails, and discard the clothes which she had when captured [doesn’t mention anything about any new clothes]. Then she shall stay in your house and mourn for her father and mother for a full month [did you kill them?]. After that you may have intercourse with her. You shall be her husband and she shall be your wife. But if you no longer find her pleasing, let her go free. You must not sell her, nor treat her harshly since you have had your way with her [Ed – But if you hadn’t then that would be OK? This also seems to imply that you can have your way with her before you get married – the King James says “humbled” instead of had your way with… don’t know which one is right]”
[New English Bible]
(Bigamy)
” If a man have two wives, one beloved, and another hated, and they have borne him children, both the beloved and the hated; and if the firstborn son be hers that was hated: then it shall be, when he maketh his sons to inherit that which he hath, that he may not make the son of the beloved firstborn before the son of the hated, which is indeed the firstborn: but he shall acknowledge the son of the hated for the firstborn, by giving him a double portion of all that he hath: for he is the beginning of his strength; the right of the firstborn is his.”
[King James Bible]
(Having your son put to death)
“If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them:
then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place;
and they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard.
And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and all Israel shall hear, and fear.”

So often I watch a concert and I’m blown away by the talent of the people who are playing. It happens most when it’s something where I know how much work it takes to learn something.

This band (Borievka) playing at the Slovakian Dance weekend at the JRC/Giobbia was such an experience. Sorry the video is terrible and it’s in WMV format but I can’t be bothered to spend hours looking for a free way to convert it. In any case it’s the sound that’s interesting although it would have been good to capture the incredible speed and co-ordination of the violinist’s fingers. If you know a little about violin playing, you can hear it in the sound track. I’ve been learning this kind of music since about 1999 now and I just couldn’t stop smiling when I watched them. Fast eddy here is a track that has the same effect on me (esp the clarinet part.

In case you haven’t already tried google earth, you really should.
Unfortunately none of my local spots are in hi-res but I love setting it to fly around Siberia.
It’s also great exploring the wonders of the world and various sites (e.g.) have bookmarks you can use. Here’s one that Luke sent me (you have to have Google earth installed).
—–Begin anti-global-inverse-snobbery rant ———
One interesting question that occurs to me here. What with the recent spate of articles highlighting the meteoric growth of Google and its possible transition from popular garage start-up icon to increasingly MS-like multinational taking over niches right left and centre: will this sort of post be embarassing in 10 years’time? I’ve never subscribed to bashing companies just because they are successful or because they do what any other entity in the competitive capitalist world would do.
—–End anti-global-inverse-snobbery rant ———

This (an international small claims procedure), if it works, is going to stir things up a bit. It’s very good news for me as I’ve been wanting to sue my neighbour for a long time for not paying the communal water bills but it would have cost more in Italian solicitor’s bills than we’d collectively gain (about 800 Euro).
And while we’re on boring topics, the abolition of the yuan-dollar peg is very significant and seems not to have been noticed around the world. The trade gap between China and the US (for e.g.) is I believe over 20 billion us$ a month. So if China is really floating the Yuan, this seems like something which will have an incredibly big effect on world economics and power balance. But maybe I just don’t understand economics…

http://www.copepod.co.uk/ (mouse over the stuff on the background)
http://www.lukebarlowband.com/

This idea is based on the standard password recovery scenario for web sites. It’s also expanding on a hint given about this by Lorrie Cranor in her keynote at www2005. Most username password authetication systems on web sites just end up with me having to ask for my password to be emailed back to me every time anyway – so why not automate that process.
How about replacing the standard username password login/authentication setup with the following.
1. When I register with a service I register my email address and confirm this in the usual way. Whenever I have to authenticate myself to a server, my browser sends my email address.
2. The server sends an email to my email account with a URL containing some credentials.
3. My email client reads the email automatically and redirects the OS to open up the page I wanted to access, including the authentication credentials. The server checks the credentials against the email address and the email it sent me to see if they match (Only someone who has my email password can know the secret – or someone who has intercepted our communication).
From the user’s point of view, it means no more remembering passwords and basically seamless access.
Problems and responses ():
1. Delay in receiving the email. (mostly only 1 min maximum)
2. The email is plaintext and insecure. (That’s the case in the standard password recovery scenario. I considered sending a public key along with the email address so that the server’s email can be encrypted – and then encrypting the response with the server’s public key. But then I thought that this is equivalent to a plugin which asks the user to sign a credential with his PGP key and then checks against a registered public key. This is nothing new and has well-known problems (Public Key Infrastructure etc….) It’s a possible extension but it should be born in mind that it’s adding more security than we are use normally.
3. You need a plugin in both the email client and the browser and they have to be able to talk to each other. (No problem for standard setups)
4. It’s only as secure as the person’s email un and password (but most web logins don’t require anything more anyway).